The equestrian world is abuzz with a controversy that has ignited a firestorm of public support: the exclusion of the highly decorated dressage horse Hermès, ridden by Dutch Olympian Dinja van Liere, from the Tokyo Olympic Games. This exclusion, stemming from a bureaucratic blunder by a FEI (Fédération Equestre Internationale) stagiaire, has sparked outrage and led to an unprecedented outpouring of support, culminating in a rapidly growing online petition demanding Hermès' reinstatement – a petition titled, simply, "Hermès naar Tokio."
The petition, launched by Robin van der Starre, Dinja van Liere's partner, initially gained traction slowly. Just before noon on the day of its launch, the number of signatures barely reached 500. However, the story quickly gained momentum, propelled by the widespread feeling of injustice and the outpouring of sympathy for Van Liere and her exceptional horse. Within hours, the number of signatures soared, rapidly approaching and surpassing the 10,000 mark, a testament to the depth of public feeling on the matter. The petition serves as a powerful symbol of the collective will of the Dutch equestrian community and beyond, demanding a reconsideration of the FEI's decision.
The core issue revolves around the seemingly arbitrary and unforgiving application of FEI rules. Dinja van Liere, a highly accomplished dressage rider, was initially slated to compete in Tokyo with her star horse, Hermès. Hermès, a magnificent and exceptionally talented animal, had consistently demonstrated top-tier performance, solidifying his place as a contender for Olympic glory. The prospect of witnessing this partnership on the world stage was highly anticipated by fans and experts alike.
However, a catastrophic administrative error shattered those expectations. A stagiaire, an intern working within the FEI, made a critical mistake in the paperwork related to Hermès' vaccination records. This oversight, a simple bureaucratic blunder, was deemed sufficient by the FEI to disqualify the pair from the Olympic Games. The unforgiving nature of the rules, coupled with the seemingly disproportionate punishment for a simple administrative error, has ignited a firestorm of criticism directed at the FEI.
The swift and decisive action taken by the FEI, despite the clear accidental nature of the transgression, has left many questioning the organization's fairness and flexibility. The argument centers around the fact that Hermès himself was not at fault; he met all the necessary health and competition standards. The error was solely an administrative one, a human mistake that should not, according to many, have resulted in such a severe penalty. The situation has prompted calls for a review of the FEI’s regulations, highlighting the need for more nuanced and forgiving systems that take into account human error and extenuating circumstances.
current url：https://cotyka.d793y.com/news/petitie-hermes-naar-tokio-87990